Understanding IFS

We are not one — we are many

Stéphane Dion

Feb. 2026 · 6 min read

When we say 'I'm in conflict with myself', we're describing something real. IFS takes that experience at face value: we are made of parts, sub-personalities, inner dimensions that each have their own needs, fears, and beliefs. This isn't a disorder. It's the nature of the human mind.

Traditional psychology often tries to integrate or harmonize these contradictory voices into a coherent identity. IFS proposes something different: learning to coexist with them, to listen to them, to understand their roles.

Every part has a positive intention, even when its behavior is problematic. A part that constantly criticizes may have originally wanted to protect you from shame by anticipating others' judgment. A part that procrastinates may have wanted to protect you from failure.

When we understand this multiplicity, we stop blaming ourselves for our inner contradictions. We start asking: which part is speaking right now? What does it need?

This is a profound shift — not a project of unification, but a project of relationship. Psychological health in IFS is a system of parts that can coexist without fighting, guided by a Self capable of listening to all of them.

Stéphane Dion

IFS Practitioner

Start a conversationSubscribe to the newsletter →

Read also

Understanding IFS

Dick Schwartz and the birth of IFS

Parts

What your intense reactions are trying to tell you

We are not one — we are many — IFS-Montréal